Gunjo · Business Intelligence for the AI Era
← Sticker Wall JOURNEY · DETAIL

Airwallex — How an Australian Chinese team entered via cross-border payment pricing and upgraded into an enterprise-grade global treasury management platform

Founded: Jack Zhang (Zhang Weiqian), Lucy Liu (Liu Yueting), Max Li (Li Shuo), Ki-Lok Wong (Huang Jile), Dai Nguyen · Airwallex

JOURNEY

Key Fields

FIELD STAMPS
IndustryFintech
RegionMulti-region
ScaleGiant
ChannelOther

Origin

Founders Jack Zhang and Max Li once ran a Gloria Jean's coffee shop in Melbourne. When importing materials such as paper cups and syrups, they were frequently charged high cross-border remittance fees and poor exchange rates by banks, losing 3% to 5% on every transaction. They found that existing payment solutions did not address the real pain points of SMEs, so they brought in Lucy Liu and others to found Airwallex, aiming to build a cheaper, more transparent, and faster cross-border payment infrastructure.

Milestones

2015
Founded Growth
In 2015, Airwallex was founded in Melbourne, Australia. The founding team initially started from the coffee shop operating scenario, hoping to solve the problem of banks adding layer upon layer of markups when paying for imported materials cross-border. In its early stage, the company did not directly obtain a financial license. Instead, it first entered cross-border currency exchange and payment processes with a technology solution. Early office setup and product validation were both centered on local SMEs in Australia.
2016
Early financing Turning point
In early financing, the company received funds from Tencent, Sequoia China, Mastercard, and other institutions, and its valuation rose rapidly. At the same time, the team found that a tool-type product that simply made money on exchange rate spreads had a limited ceiling, and customer retention and transaction frequency were unstable, prompting management to consider transforming from a single payment tool into an enterprise treasury management platform. This period lasted from 2016 to 2017.
2017
Product failure Failure
Airwallex once launched a consumer-facing cross-border remittance card product, hoping to replicate Revolut-style individual user growth. However, after launch, user growth was slow, compliance costs were high, and it was disconnected from the core B2B scenarios, so the team ultimately cut it. This failed product instead made the company realize that it had to focus on enterprise-level high-frequency payment and treasury management needs, rather than following the trend of consumer wallets. This period lasted from 2017 to 2018.
2018
Licensing and compliance Inflection point
The company successively applied for payment licenses or partnered with licensed institutions in the UK, Europe, Australia, Hong Kong, the US, and other places, gradually gaining local acquiring, card issuing, currency exchange, and settlement capabilities. Compliance investment was huge and the cycle was long, and it repeatedly faced regulatory review delays, but this also became a core barrier for subsequently serving cross-border e-commerce, platform-type clients, and SaaS companies. This period lasted from 2018 to 2019.
2020
Pandemic growth PMF
The COVID-19 pandemic drove an explosion in global e-commerce and remote teams, and usage of Airwallex's cross-border payment and multi-currency account products rose rapidly. With modules such as online collection, batch payments, and card issuing, the company gradually developed the stickiness of a treasury management platform. Annualized transaction volume and customer numbers grew in tandem, and revenue expanded several times between 2020 and 2021, entering a stable enterprise-level PMF stage.
2022
Platform expansion Growth
In 2022, Airwallex expanded from payments into expense management, embedded finance APIs, multi-currency corporate cards, and risk management, with customers covering industries such as SaaS, e-commerce, online travel, and the platform economy. The team disclosed that its annualized revenue exceeded USD 500 million, its global workforce reached more than 2,000 people, and it increased local teams in the US, Europe, and Southeast Asia, trying to break away from relying solely on cross-border e-commerce customers.
2025
AI and physical payments Turning point
In 2025, the company formally proposed an AI financial infrastructure strategy, using AI technology to optimize anti-fraud, compliance review, exchange rate forecasting, and fund routing. After completing a new round of financing in 2026, its valuation reached USD 11 billion, and it began entering the offline physical payment terminal market, benchmarking against Stripe, Square, and Adyen. On a public podcast, management set a next target valuation of USD 100 billion, meaning a comprehensive upgrade from a cross-border payment player to a global financial infrastructure provider.

Turning Points

  • Cut the consumer cross-border remittance card product and concentrated all resources on enterprise treasury management.
  • Built local acquiring and settlement capabilities through multi-region licensing, upgrading from a tool-type product to a platform.
  • The pandemic in 2020 triggered an explosion in payment demand from global e-commerce and remote teams, completing enterprise-level PMF validation.
  • After financing in 2026, valuation reached USD 11 billion and it set a USD 100 billion target, expanding from cross-border payments to AI financial infrastructure and offline payments.
  • Used AI to redo compliance anti-fraud and fund routing, opening up an efficiency gap with traditional payment service providers.

Failures & Pitfalls

  • The consumer-oriented cross-border remittance card product grew slowly and was eventually cut, wasting significant energy and capital.
  • Early reliance on a single exchange-rate spread model led to insufficient customer stickiness, with repeat purchases and transaction frequency far below expectations.
  • Payment license applications in multiple countries were repeatedly delayed, and the compliance cycle and costs far exceeded the founding team's initial estimates.
  • Early expansion in the US market was constrained by local competition and insufficient brand awareness, progressing far more slowly than in Southeast Asia and Europe.
  • The transition from a payment tool to a treasury management platform once caused product line confusion, forcing the team to repeatedly narrow priorities.

关键成功要素

  • Enter through real pain points from coffee shop procurement, rather than designing products from a financial professional perspective.
  • First solve enterprises' high-frequency cross-border payments and currency exchange, then gradually lock in customers with accounts, card issuing, and expense management.
  • Investment in licensing and compliance is the heaviest but most non-replicable moat in cross-border payments.
  • Cutting the failed consumer product and focusing on a B2B treasury management platform was the key turning point for valuation improvement.
  • The anti-fraud and fund routing efficiency brought by AI is the core narrative for the USD 60 billion to USD 100 billion target after 2026.

Lessons

  • Validating pain points in high-frequency real scenarios is more reliable than building a financial platform first; the coffee shop was the best product manager.
  • Tool-type payment products are easily replaced, so they must be tied to accounts, card issuing, compliance, and expense management to increase stickiness.
  • Consumer product logic cannot be copied to B2B; figure out who the customer is before investing in development.
  • Geographic expansion in cross-border payments cannot use equal effort everywhere; select defensible priority markets among Southeast Asia, Europe, and the US.
  • Valuation growth depends on a clear second-curve narrative. AI financial infrastructure and offline payments are Airwallex's way of hedging against the red ocean of cross-border payments.

Core Data

  • 估值110亿美金:Publicly stated valuation after the completion of new financing in 2026 (based on public information, not independently verified)
  • 累计融资超10亿美金:Cumulative financing since the company's founding exceeds USD 1 billion across multiple rounds (based on public information, not independently verified)
  • 年化营收超5亿美金:Revenue level for 2024 to 2025 disclosed by management on a podcast (based on public information, not independently verified)
  • 全球员工超2000人:Team size disclosed for 2024 to 2025 (based on public information, not independently verified)
  • 支付牌照覆盖地区超50个:Number of regions the company officially claims to support (based on public information, not independently verified)
  • 2026目标估值1000亿美金:Long-term target publicly proposed by management (based on public information, not independently verified)

Competitors / Peers

Airwallex directly benchmarks against Stripe, Adyen, Square, and Payoneer. Stripe is stronger in developer ecosystem and global coverage of online acquiring; Adyen focuses on localized acquiring for large retail and platform companies; Payoneer has long served cross-border e-commerce fund disbursement scenarios. Airwallex's differentiator is that it started from Australia and the Chinese e-commerce community, understands cross-border multi-currency accounts and batch payment needs better, and uses AI compliance and fund routing to lower operating costs. In 2026, its expansion into offline physical payment terminals means it will collide head-on with Square and Adyen in the in-store acquiring market.